High school varsity athletes · qualitative study

How do athletes see their bodies?

A research project exploring how performance, appearance, social comparison, and sport-specific expectations shape body image in competitive high school athletes.

01 · Conceptual framework

Body image is more than appearance.

The project uses a multidimensional framework that treats body image as an interaction among how athletes perceive, think about, feel about, and act toward their bodies.

01

Perceptual

How athletes notice and describe their own bodies: strength, endurance, size, body fat, flexibility, and other characteristics.

“What do I notice?”
02

Cognitive

Beliefs and standards about the “ideal” athletic body, including comparison with peers and expectations attached to a sport.

“What should I look like?”
03

Affective

Confidence, satisfaction, discomfort, pressure, anxiety, or pride connected to the body and athletic performance.

“How do I feel?”
04

Behavioral

Training, recovery, diet, body checking, and other choices athletes make in response to how they understand their bodies.

“What do I do?”
02 · Central tension

The athlete’s body lives in two systems.

Participants often evaluated the same body as both a tool for performance and an object that is seen, compared, and judged.

Performance

What can my body do?

Strength, speed, endurance, recovery, mobility, and sport-specific function were recurring ways athletes made sense of their bodies.

Appearance

What does my body look like?

Even when performance came first, visual ideals and external judgment still shaped body satisfaction and comparison.

03 · Emerging findings

Patterns across the interviews.

The coded interview material suggests that body image shifts with sport context, social comparison, and the athlete’s immediate performance goals.

Performance

Function often comes first.

Several athletes described the body through speed, strength, endurance, coordination, or readiness to compete rather than through appearance alone.

Appearance

Visual ideals do not disappear.

Athletes could prioritize performance while still wanting to look leaner, more muscular, or more recognizably “athletic.”

Social comparison

Other bodies become reference points.

Peers, elite athletes, social media, and imagined judgments can shape standards for what a “good” body is supposed to look like.

Sport context

There is no single athletic ideal.

Different sports reward different combinations of leanness, size, power, endurance, flexibility, and coordination.

Tension

Looking athletic and performing well can conflict.

Some coded responses explicitly described tradeoffs between an appearance goal and the body characteristics needed for sport performance.

Confidence

Confidence can be performance-based.

For some athletes, feeling strong, prepared, or seeing athletic progress mattered more to confidence than matching an appearance ideal.

04 · Explore further

Athlete explorer + coding map.

The new page lets viewers click through sport-specific patterns and inspect an interactive coding map built from the interview themes.

New page

Explore the Athletes

Click through Tennis, Hockey, Dance, and Cross Country to compare what each sport seems to reward, pressure, and normalize.

Open athlete explorer

Interactive

Coding map

Open a dimension-by-dimension map of themes like strength identity, social comparison, appearance anxiety, and behavior change.

Jump to coding map

Use case

Better for portfolio review

This version feels more like a student research site than a paper upload, which makes it stronger for readers, teachers, and portfolio viewers.

05 · Voices from the coding

What participants actually emphasized.

Short excerpts are shown without names to keep the focus on the pattern rather than the individual.

“Performance is more important to me.”
Participant excerpt · performance-first coding
“I’m more focusing on performance.”Participant excerpt
“I want [my body] to look more like an athlete.”Participant excerpt · appearance / identity
“I compare with others.”Participant excerpt · social comparison

This showcase summarizes research material about body image and may reference weight, appearance pressure, and body-related behavior. It is designed as an academic presentation, not health advice.

06 · Method

Built to capture meaning, not just measurement.

The study is framed as qualitative and interpretivist, using semi-structured interviews so athletes can explain their experiences in their own words.

Qualitative approach

Focuses on lived experience, interpretation, and meaning around body image in competitive sport.

Semi-structured interviews

Questions span perceptual, cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions while leaving room for participants to elaborate.

Multiple sport contexts

The study considers individual sports, team sports, and aesthetic activity, including examples such as tennis, running, basketball, soccer, ice hockey, and dance.

Reflexive thematic analysis

Interview material is coded to identify recurring patterns, tensions, and meanings across participants.

07 · Why this study

The gap is not “Do athletes have body image concerns?” It is “How do they experience them?”

Adolescents are underrepresented.Much prior work focuses on college or adult elite athletes rather than high school athletes still developing physically and socially.
Numbers can flatten lived experience.Surveys can identify prevalence and correlations, but may miss how body image changes across practice, competition, injury, and social feedback.
Sport type matters.Qualitative work across different sport settings can reveal how distinct athletic ideals shape the same body in different ways.
08 · Selected literature

Research informing the project.

Selected works cited in the draft introduction and research framing.

Cash & Grasso (2005)

The norms and stability of new measures of the multidimensional body image construct. Body Image, 2(2), 199–203.

Thompson & Schaefer (2019)

Thomas F. Cash: A multidimensional innovator in the measurement of body image. Body Image, 31, 198–203.

Firoozjah et al. (2022)

Comparison of eating disorder symptoms and body image between individual and team sport adolescent athletes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Eating Disorders, 10(1), 119.

Borowiec et al. (2023)

Eating disorder risk in adolescent and adult female athletes: the role of body satisfaction, sport type, BMI, level of competition, and training background. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 15, 91.

D’Anna et al. (2024)

Longitudinal evolution of physical activity type and eating and weight concerns among adolescents. Eating and Weight Disorders, 29, 75.

Budhraja et al. (2025)

“Change needs to start at home”: A reflexive thematic analysis of girl athletes’ and coaches’ experiences of body image in New Delhi, India. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 76, 102774.

Ogden, McCourt, & Morgan (2025)

“You’re basically naked”: a qualitative study of why girls drop out of sport in their teenage years. Cogent Psychology, 12(1).

Sundgot-Borgen, Sundgot-Borgen, & Mathisen (2026)

Appearance pressure, body image, and nutrition practices in youth athletes: Implications for performance. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance.